2012/2/4 Luca Bruno <[email protected]>:
> On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 9:44 PM, Stefan Risberg <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>>
>> It will complain that XcbVisualID doesn't exist but in the vapi it
>> looks like this
>> public struct VisualID : uint32
>> {}
>>
>> but I changed it to
>> [CCode (cname = "unsigned int")]
>>
>> and it worked. There are other places that complain about the same
>> stuff, but this was the easiest to describe.
>>
>> So am I doing something wrong, if not how should the correct way to
>> fix the problem above?
>
>
> If there's no VisualID in the xcb C API, then it is correct that you have to
> set the cname.
>
> --
> www.debian.org - The Universal Operating System
ok, I started to rewrite the whole thing, or copypaste all parts that
were good, but I have another question.
I have
[SimpleType]
[CCode (cname = "xcb_screen_iterator_t")]
public struct ScreenIterator
{
public unowned Screen data;
public int rem;
public int index;
[CCode (cname = "xcb_screen_next", is_ref=1)]
public void next();
}
xcb_screen_next expects *xcb_screen_iterator_t but now it gets
xcb_screen_iterator_t,
but if I have it like it is in the standard vapi I need to write
Xcb.ScreenIterator.next(ref iter) but I
want to be able to write iter.next();
Is it possible to make it behave like that?
_______________________________________________
vala-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
