Hey - i think this is a problem with glib-2.0.vapi. If you read the
class definition, then i think, there must be a problem.
public class HashTable<K,V> {
[CCode (cname = "g_hash_table_new_full", simple_generics = true)]
public HashTable (HashFunc<K>? hash_func, EqualFunc<K>?
key_equal_func);
public HashTable.full (HashFunc<K>? hash_func, EqualFunc<K>?
key_equal_func, DestroyNotify? key_destroy_func, DestroyNotify?
value_destroy_func);
The CCode cname definition describe a cname for both constructor
functions. I think, the simple constructor should use g_hash_table_new
as cname.
--
Günther Wutz
Student der University of Applied Science
Allgemeine Informatik
Am Sonntag, den 22.04.2012, 20:10 +0200 schrieb Dennis Möhlmann:
> class LexerDefinition: HashTable<string, LexerNode> {
>
> [CCode (has_construct_function = false)] // ??
> public LexerDefinition() {
> base(str_hash, str_equal);
> }
> }
_______________________________________________
vala-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
