That's a nice synopsis of what is needed. The question is why is it not happening? Let's just assume for a minute that Vala is the right language to attract more mainstream development to linux, and I don't want to debate that (please, no!), then make the next logical assumption that more people would try it out if this ideal IDE actually existed. Given the fact that making it happen is non trivial, you would need to get a team of people together to work it out, collaborating with the language author. The compiler would probably need to change if you really want debugging on something at the level of Visual Studio.
Unfortunately, programmers of these kind of tools don't grow on trees or have the luxury of devoting the necessary time to a project of this nature without being payed to do it. So you need a benevolent sponsor who benefits from an open source IDE for general linux development or you need a company to develop it for profit. Well, who has the resources and the most to gain from developing such an environment as open source? The first thought is Red Hat or Ubuntu, but what do they accomplish if they fund the project? Do they gain more users of their platform? Not if the tool works on other distros as well (although you could argue that better dev tools bring more users to linux in general). Do they make the product free but only usable on their own distro? Not in their makeup. What about a company making a proprietary version for profit? Is there enough interest or demand for such a tool when most developers are targeting far more popular OS's that have all the proper motivations for maintaining great development tools? Personally, I am amazed at how useful and robust the development tools on linux are given that environment. So, I'm willing to do without some niceties in order to write in Vala instead of C. On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:45 AM, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I see good intentions here, just a note about the "obnoxious > ValaToys" (why obnoxious?!? ;) ) > > >The best I've seen of that is the > obnoxious ValaToys completion which did > >not parse documentation > comments and acquired symbols > >only from opened files. > > This is not > true, vala toys has support for the concept of a "project" with 3 > backends (the most tested is the autotools one) and > the completion > engine acquires symbols from all the project's files and not only the > opened ones, also it finds all the vapi from the > project packages. > > To > see all the functions that VTG offers you should use "open project" > from the file menu', > or enable the *experimental* option > "Automatically Find Project Root Folder" in the plugin option, and open > a vala file. > > When you have a "project" opened you can jump to any file > or symbol etc... > > The real problem is that afrodite, the completion > engine library, is very very buggy slow and leaky. > I've several idea to > fix it, but no time to do any real development (I'll accept patches of > course) > > Having said that, in my opinion the best feature I'd like to > see is an integrated debugger. > > Have a nice day, > Andrea > > P.S. > I'm the > vala-toys developer > > _______________________________________________ > vala-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list > -- Duff
_______________________________________________ vala-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
