On Sat, 2012-06-30 at 12:39 -0700, Charles Hixson wrote: > My first take is that the answer is no, and I'm enough of a neophyte that > > words.vala:53.29-53.33: error: `Entry' is not a supported generic type > argument, use `?' to box value types > > ... > > HashMap<int32, Entry> ids;
HashMap<int32, Entry?> ids; > currently I'm avoiding the problem by converting the struct to a class, > and at least in this case that's a reasonable approach, (or, of course, > I could probably store a pointer to the struct, but in my eyes one of > the advantages of Vala is that it minimizes the number of times I need > to explicitly deal with pointers). It's generally best to void structs unless you are concerned about performance, and even then you have to be careful. structs are allocated on the stack and aren't reference counted or registered with the GObject type system, so they can be much faster when used properly. However, they are harder to use and easy to misuse. It is easy to accidentally copy them, which can easily counteract their performance benefits. -Evan _______________________________________________ vala-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
