Thanks! didnt thought about it.
On 10 Dec 2013, at 19:19, Evan Nemerson <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 18:19 +0100, pancake wrote:
>> I have been doing some bindings for Vala and noticed something inconsistent
>> in the naming of enums.
>>
>> // VALID
>> enum Foo {
>> 1FOO
>> }
>>
>> // INVALID
>> enum Bar {
>> 33
>> }
>>
>> The thing is that you can name an enum like Foo.1FOO, but not Bar.33,
>> if the reason to support enums prefixed with a number is because the C
>> translation doesnt breaks anything.. why do using numeric values
>> breaks?
>>
>> Is this defined by the Vala language or it’s just a bug?
>
> Refusing to accept 33 is not a bug. Accepting 1FOO might be.
>
> You can use
>
> public enum Bar {
> @33
> }
>
>
> -Evan
_______________________________________________
vala-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
