Hi,
am I correct in assuming that Vala is supposed to inherit the lack of
memory safety from C? Or put differently: If there is Vala code that
does not guard callers from memory safety violations but it could do so,
this is not a problem because callers are generally expected to fulfill
such (implicit) preconditions.
Is this documented somewhere?
Thanks,
Florian
--
Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security Team
_______________________________________________
vala-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
