Be careful, Gmail marked me this mail as spam, don't know why. --
* EOF * 2016-01-09 15:25 GMT+01:00 Mario Daniel Ruiz Saavedra < [email protected]>: > It's not currently possible to do that on most systems, take a look > at File creation times [LWN.net] > | | > | | | | | | > | File creation times [LWN.net]By Jonathan Corbet July 26, 2010 Linux > systems, like the Unix systems that came before, maintain threedifferent > timestamps for each file. | > | | > | Ver en lwn.net | Vista previa por Yahoo | > | | > | | > > > > Mario Daniel Ruiz Saavedra Estudiante Ing. Sistemas - Universidad del > Norte [email protected] - twitter.com/desiderantes - > joindiaspora.com/u/desiderantes > > El Sábado, 9 de enero, 2016 8:34:17, raum <[email protected]> escribió: > > > > Hi, > > Problem between windows and linux API, probably... > > Either you can take a look to one of my project wich worked on linux > > https://github.com/Raumy/check_fs > > Regards > Le 9 janv. 2016 10:30, Chris Daley <[email protected]> a écrit : > > > > Hi all, > > > > One possible solution to this problem that would be Windows only is to > > retrieve the file creation date via the Windows API. The following code > is > > untested as I am still setting up my Winodws VM but you might be able to > > try it out in the meantime. You will need to install the Windows SDK if > you > > haven't already and I assume you are using mingw. A caveat, I haven't > used > > the Windows API in a long time so you may need to double check the > headers > > to make sure the function definitions are correct - this is for version > > 7.0. I'm assuming it's possible, as the parts of the Windows API you > would > > be linking to are C libraries and this is more or less how you would do > it > > in C# but like I said - this is an untested thought experiment that might > > be a total NO-OP. The only thing I could find on the internets was from > the > > mailing list quite a few years back - > > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.programming.vala/2867 - but it does > > suggest that this is entirely possible. > > > > Anyway, the code... > > > > // All of this is Windows API definitions which could be put into a > > separate vapi > > > > // The CreateFile flag for reading > > const int64 GENERIC_READ = 0x80000000; > > > > // Contains a 64-bit value representing the number of 100-nanosecond > > intervals since January 1, 1601 (UTC). > > struct FileTime { > > // The low-order part of the file time. > > int64 dwLowDateTime; > > // The high-order part of the file time. > > int64 dwHighDateTime; > > } > > > > struct SystemTime { > > int64 wYear; > > int64 wMonth; > > int64 wDayOfWeek; > > int64 wDay; > > int64 wHour; > > int64 wMinute; > > int64 wSecond; > > int64 wMilliseconds; > > } > > > > [CCode(cheader_filename = "WinBase.h ")] > > public extern bool GetFileTime(void* file_handle, > > out lpCreationTime, > > out lpLastAccessTime, > > out lpLastWriteTime > > ); > > > > [CCode(cheader_filename = "WinBase.h ")] > > public extern void CreateFile( > > string lpFileName, > > int64 dwDesiredAccess, > > int64 dwShareMode, > > void* lpSecurityAttributes, > > int64 dwCreationDisposition, > > int64 dwFlagsAndAttributes, > > void* hTemplateFile > > ); > > > > [CCode(cheader_filename = "WinBase.h ")] > > public extern bool FileTimeToSystemTime (FileTime filetime, out > SystemTime); > > > > public static int main (string[] args) { > > > > void* testfile = CreateFile("./test.vala", GENERIC_READ,0, null, 0, 0, > > null); > > FileTime time; > > bool success = GetFileTime(testfile,out time, null, null); > > > > if (success) { > > SystemTime systime; > > FileTimeToSystemTime (time, out systime); > > message ("Success: File created on %02d/%02d/%d %02d:%02d", > > systime.wMonth, systime.wDay, systime.wYear, systime.wHour, > > systime.wMinute); > > } else { > > message ("Something went wrong"); > > } > > } > > > > This would need to be compiled with the right paths set to the Windows > SDK > > location and linked against Kernel32.lib. > > > > Like I said, it's untested (yet) and I won't have time until next week to > > look at it again, so caveat emptor. If you're wanting to make a nicer > > demonstration out of it, you could save the Windows extern functions and > > struct definitions to a vapi file - like windows.vapi - to make it look > > less complicated (which it is, compared to the C code that would achieve > > the same effect). > > > > Let me know if you have any success. > > > > Cheers > > Chris > > > > 2016-01-08 12:35 GMT-08:00 Edwin De La Cruz <[email protected]>: > > > > > Lametablemente no way? At least not directly using Vala , I understand > > > what I have read so far. > > > I keep looking for any option , since it was very important for me to > > > do in Vala and convince some people that language worth learning ... > > > I'll keep looking. > > > Mis proyectos de software libre en: > > > Github - edwinspire > > > > > > > > > 2016-01-08 9:04 GMT-05:00 Luc Chante <[email protected]>: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > You can test le file a attached to this mail. > > > > > > > > T > _______________________________________________ > vala-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list > > > > > _______________________________________________ > vala-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list > _______________________________________________ vala-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
