> Hmm, that seems a little unfair. You submitted the patch on the 08 Aug 2016
> and it was reviewed on the 10 Aug 2016. Unfortunately your first version of
> the patch included a bug that the review identified.
Well, I fixed that bug within a day. Then it took another 12 days for Jürg to
ask another question, which I responded to within 15 Minutes. Then it took
another 3 weeks for Jürg to respond to that. Now, I totally sympathise with
Jürg, most people don't have as much time to work on their leisure projects as
they would like. But please put yourself in my shoes as somebody who's trying
to get his feet wet hacking on the Vala compiler. I mean, this is not a
rewrite-the-world patch, the actual patch is -12/+7 lines. If that takes, say,
six weeks to get merged, how long will it take to get a sufficient number of
patches merged to build enough trust to get commit access? How long will it
take to get a new feature merged, one that might be a couple hundred lines long
or something? Again, I sympathise with Jürg and his lack of time. But
nevertheless these long response times do not send the right signals to new
> I would accept there is a communication failure of the Vala release cycle,
> but I think there is a far more favourable interpretation of the decision not
> to merge the patch at the current time.
> Vala is a GNOME core project and currently follows the GNOME release cycle.
> https://wiki.gnome.org/ThreePointTwentyoneA hard code freeze started on the
> 12 Sep 2016 and you will see Vala 0.33.1 was tagged on that day. Including a
> version of Vala with GNOME 3.22.0 that cannot build some packages just isn't
> going to happen. I would say that is why your patch wasn't merged at the time.
OK, I didn't understand that. I'm happy that it now looks as though the patch
will be merged soonishly.
> BTW, thank you for your work on Vala. It looks like you have four patches in
> this next release. For anyone else who wants to see what Mattias's work has
> improved in the type system of Vala's internals see:
Perhaps you're right, maybe I should just be happy about the two bugfixes I
already got merged :-)
vala-list mailing list