Yes state 0 is not safe yet. I have to find -state-in-progress and implement
the same check.
What do you thinl. It is a good odea to continue to work on it or it is useless?
Il sab set 24 05:46:34 2016 GMT+0200, Nor Jaidi Tuah scrive:
> If I understand your patch correctly, it would generate
> something like this:
>
>
> if (_data_->_state_ != 1) {
> _data_->_state = 1;
> return FALSE;
> }
> else {
> // callback already called
> }
> etc. etc.
>
>
> I don't think that's going to work with your use case.
> _data_->_state_ would be stuck at 0 if you call the
> callback before yield.
>
> _state_in_progress_ simply doesn't help.
>
>
>
> Nice day
> Nor Jaidi Tuah
>
>
>
> PRIVILEGED/CONFIDENTIAL information may be contained in this message. If you
> are neither the addressee (intended recipient) nor an authorised recipient of
> the addressee, and have received this message in error, please destroy this
> message (including attachments) and notify the sender immediately. STRICT
> PROHIBITION: This message, whether in part or in whole, should not be
> reviewed, retained, copied, reused, disclosed, distributed or used for any
> purpose whatsoever. Such unauthorised use may be unlawful and may contain
> material protected by the Official Secrets Act (Cap 153) of the Laws of
> Brunei Darussalam. DISCLAIMER: We/This Department/The Government of Brunei
> Darussalam, accept[s] no responsibility for loss or damage arising from the
> use of this message in any manner whatsoever. Our messages are checked for
> viruses but we do not accept liability for any viruses which may be
> transmitted in or with this message.
>
_______________________________________________
vala-list mailing list
vala-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
