> > Might this be a suitable location for omega, too? Assuming someone is OK > > with maintaining it enough to keep it compiling at least? > > If someone volunteered to be a maintainer, it would be suitable, IMO. > Without a maintainer, I'm less keen because simple keep-it-compiling-only > maintenance doesn't work that well in practice, as we saw with Helgrind.
I think Omega would be a good candidate for an exp- tool. We do still need a maintainer though, else it will inevitably become unusable as the core changes. Which is a shame as there has been a constant trickle of requests about it over the past few months. With Helgrind we were kinda cheating w.r.t. keeping it compiling. It only compiles because various bits of code (eg, the main instrumentation function) had been #if 0'd or completely removed. And so it doesn't even really compile. J ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Valgrind-developers mailing list Valgrind-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/valgrind-developers
