On Fri, 16 Nov 2007, Josef Weidendorfer wrote: > I am not really settled about "--out-file". I just think that options for > similar functions in different tools should show some consistency. > So I am really fine with an option "--<toolname>-out-file=..." with support > for patterns (like %p). > > So I would change the according callgrind option to > "--callgrind-out-file=...", > independent of the fact that callgrind could produce further files with > additional suffix. > > Is this OK?
That sounds ok. In summary: --log-file=<pattern> --cachegrind-out-file=<pattern> --massif-out-file=<pattern> --callgrind-out-file=<pattern> The latter could also be --callgrind-out-prefix, but I'm ok with --callgrind-out-file. We could also shorten the options names, eg. --cg-out-file, but I'm not too fussed about that. Nick ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Valgrind-developers mailing list Valgrind-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/valgrind-developers
