On Fri, 7 Dec 2007, Julian Seward wrote: > 1. no entry was ever made for "a" > (really, for VG_ROUNDDN(a, BYTES_PER_SEC_VBIT_NODE)), or > > 2. there was an entry, but it has since been deleted, or > > 3. some other snafu. > > Hmm, on rereading previous messages, all of (2) is irrelevant if > you disabled gcSecVBitTable and the problem still exists. So > it's either 1. or 3. Can you at least try 1. ?
Hopefully it's 1. If it's 3, then the secVbits set/get calls match up, which (I think) means the secVBits table is getting corrupted somehow. Or maybe the set/get calls themselves are buggy? Nick ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php _______________________________________________ Valgrind-developers mailing list Valgrind-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/valgrind-developers
