On Friday 22 February 2008 15:24, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 2:38 PM, Julian Seward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I am (very) surprised to hear that track_{start,stop}_client_code
> > give wrong results.
>
> As soon as I have the time I will look further into this issue. But
> please note that I have raised this issue more than once in the past
> -- see e.g. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152728.
Yes. I'm only saying that track_{start,stop}_client_code look correct
to me, and so the problem is more likely to be elsewhere, perhaps:
VG_(get_running_tid)() produces wrong results, under some circumstances,
or
the assertion that VG_(get_running_tid)() and track_{start,stop}_client_code
agree is not always valid, for some subtle reason.
I am a bit unclear about the precise semantics of VG_(get_running_tid)
(was it ever specified, exactly? I don't know). That probably doesn't
help. A first step might be to specify exactly the behaviour of this fn.
J
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Valgrind-developers mailing list
Valgrind-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/valgrind-developers
