On Tue, 26 Feb 2008, Bart Van Assche wrote: > By the way, does the patch below make sense or is the comment in > tests/vg_regtest.in correct as it is now ? > > Index: tests/vg_regtest.in > =================================================================== > --- tests/vg_regtest.in (revision 7477) > +++ tests/vg_regtest.in (working copy) > @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ > # Note that filters are necessary for stderr results to filter out things that > # always change, eg. process id numbers. > # > -# Expected stdout (filtered) is kept in <test>.stdout.exp[0-9]* (can be more > +# Expected stdout (filtered) is kept in <test>.stdout.exp* (can be more > # than one expected output). It can be missing if it would be empty. > Expected > # stderr (filtered) is kept in <test>.stderr.exp*. There must be at least > # one stderr.exp* file.
The comment is correct. For example, in memcheck/tests/ we have both: sh-mem-random.stdout.exp sh-mem-random.stdout.exp64 For 32- and 64-bit machines Nick ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Valgrind-developers mailing list Valgrind-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/valgrind-developers
