On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 3:30 PM, Julian Seward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Friday 23 November 2007 14:27, Konstantin Serebryany wrote: > > >> If anybody can figure out why the PDF doc build fails on > > >> openSUSE 10.2 and later, that would be great. > > > > Who is guilty, xsltproc or pdfxmltex? > > Does xsltproc produce the same index.fo on these two systems? > > If you have the time to chase this around, that would be great :-)
A quote from "DocBook XSL: The Complete Guide" (http://www.sagehill.net/docbookxsl/FOprocessors.html): PassiveTeX from Sebastian Rahtz (http://www.tei-c.org.uk/Software/passivetex/) is a free XSL-FO processor based on TeX. It has fallen behind in its implementation of the XSL-FO specification, and many features of DocBook XSL do not work in PassiveTeX. Not recommended. As far as I know PassiveTeX was last updated in March 2004. Does anyone have a suggestion for a replacement for PassiveTex ? Bart. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Valgrind-developers mailing list Valgrind-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/valgrind-developers
