Nicholas Nethercote wrote: > On Mon, 17 Nov 2008, Michael Rosellini wrote: > >> Both of the previous two problems I wrote about (valgrind crash while >> delivering a fatal signal and reports that things that were on the heap >> were on the stack) are eliminated when my program no longer switches >> stacks during startup. I've confirmed that I'm calling >> VALGRIND_STACK_REGISTER correctly. Has anyone else experienced a similar >> problem? > > I think the stack registration stuff is a bit buggy, but I don't recall the > details right now. I think people must not use it very much.
It's rubbish, and needs a complete ground up rework rather than band aid patches. IIRC there are at least two different ideas internally of what the current stack is and only one of those pays attention to the user stack registration stuff. In fact the user stack registration stuff does very little, and much less than most users probably expect when they use it. Tom -- Tom Hughes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.compton.nu/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Valgrind-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/valgrind-users
