On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 1:15 PM, Michel Audette<[email protected]> wrote: > See example below. I don't recall details of offending instructions > being replaced by ??? in the past. Is this a new option that I should > be setting, or an indication of a spurious error? > > ==27271== Use of uninitialised value of size 8 > ==27271== at 0x187FCEC6: (within /usr/lib/libGLcore.so.180.44) > ==27271== by 0x41FF6BF: (within /usr/lib/libGL.so.180.44) > ==27271== by 0x41FF6BF: (within /usr/lib/libGL.so.180.44) > ==27271== by 0x7FEFFE22F: ???
??? is usually either dynamically-generated code with no backing file, or a shared library that was unloaded before the error report was generated, I think. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Valgrind-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/valgrind-users
