On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 3:20 AM, Belmon, Stephane<[email protected]> wrote: > When Massif culls "old" snapshots, it drops about half of them, and then > resets its period to the MIN() of the inter-snapshots times. > > For long runs, that has somewhat unexpected consequences. You can easily end > up with 75 snapshots that are about a minute apart, and then have the last 25 > about 20 seconds apart for example (or worse). Graphs which don't look at the > "time=X" can then be a bit misleading -- and that includes ms_print's I > believe, Martijn's massifplot, and I'd expect most homegrown tools.
Hmm, interesting, I didn't realise that could happen. Would you mind filing a bug for this? (http://www.valgrind.org/support/bug_reports.html) Nick ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Valgrind-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/valgrind-users
