On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Julian Seward <jsew...@acm.org> wrote:
>
> >       * Line information is missing in valgrind report. That works when
> >         compiling with gcc.
>
> Yes, I noticed that too.  I haven't investigated.  btw, you should
> have a look at https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=242137,
> which is also related to a LLVM+Valgrind issue.
>
> >       * clang complains about "return value not ignored as it should be"
> >         when using the client request macros in the code (-Wall
> >         -Werror).
>
> Does that still happen with a Valgrind svn trunk build?  I thought Bart
> did some fixes in that area.  Or proposed some fixes.  Or something like
> that.

The patch attached to https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=242137
still triggers "return value not ignored as it should be" with gcc 4.4
and before. I'll update that patch such that these warnings are gone
too.

Bart.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benefiting from Server Virtualization: Beyond Initial Workload 
Consolidation -- Increasing the use of server virtualization is a top
priority.Virtualization can reduce costs, simplify management, and improve 
application availability and disaster protection. Learn more about boosting 
the value of server virtualization. http://p.sf.net/sfu/vmware-sfdev2dev
_______________________________________________
Valgrind-users mailing list
Valgrind-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/valgrind-users

Reply via email to