On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 12:27 AM, Eric Schwarz <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Is this a known behaviour for vector<>'s standard allocator to allocate and
> hand back like this?
>
> Does anyone know why this is the case? - Sorry for might posting C++ related
> question.

A C++ vector implementation might do all sorts of things you don't
expect w.r.t. memory management.  In short, I wouldn't be surprised by
much.

Nick

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Simplify data backup and recovery for your virtual environment with vRanger. 
Installation's a snap, and flexible recovery options mean your data is safe,
secure and there when you need it. Data protection magic?
Nope - It's vRanger. Get your free trial download today. 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-sfdev2dev
_______________________________________________
Valgrind-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/valgrind-users

Reply via email to