Hi Josef,
You are completely right. The calls into PLT are printed if
> "--skip-plt=no" is specified. Then, the results should look
> a lot better.
Perfect :)
> Looks like the places where dl_runtime_resolve() "returns" into the
> resolved
> functions. Not sure what you are doing wrong here, but I remember that I
> had
> to special-case dl_runtime_resolve. I even have a signature check for the
> machine code for the case that the runtime linker is stripped...
You are right! Thanks :)
I see your code, I try to do the same as callgrind.
> Yes, of course. While unwinding, it will see the marker, and thus it knows
> that the signal handler was left. I.e. instead of adding calls to the
> (separate) call graph of the signal handler, it returns to the regular call
> graph of the thread.
Ok, I think I understand.
Josef thanks for your help, i appreciate your patience with me.
Emilio.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Malware Security Report: Protecting Your Business, Customers, and the
Bottom Line. Protect your business and customers by understanding the
threat from malware and how it can impact your online business.
http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51427462/
_______________________________________________
Valgrind-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/valgrind-users
