On 02/11/11 07:41, Peter Toft wrote: > Actually in the future I would wish that memcheck could be extended so > it could catch it - even if it would cost compile-time changes. > > Valgrind is a great tool, but its user-value would increase quite a bit, > if it could catch a bit more (e.g. like my example).
As we have explained, valgrind does support it, just in a different tool. There are performance reasons for keeping them separate because they operate in completely different ways. Tom -- Tom Hughes ([email protected]) http://compton.nu/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ RSA® Conference 2012 Save $700 by Nov 18 Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 _______________________________________________ Valgrind-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/valgrind-users
