On 23.01.2012 22:16, Tom Hughes wrote: > Well that is an AVX instruction, but I thought they were only valid in 64 bit > mode as 0xC5 is (as John said) LDS in 32 bit mode. In 64 bit mode it is a VEX > prefix for an AVX instruction. Ok interesting. Does that mean my gcc produces bad code or is your assumption wrong or something else? :P
> Details on the work to add AVX support to valgrind can be found in the bug > tracker: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=273475 Hm doesn't seem to get much attention since early october last year. :/ -- Mierswa, Daniel If you still don't like it, that's ok: that's why I'm boss. I simply know better than you do. --- Linus Torvalds, comp.os.linux.advocacy, 1996/07/22 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Try before you buy = See our experts in action! The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3, Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-dev2 _______________________________________________ Valgrind-users mailing list Valgrind-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/valgrind-users
