Hello

I have a C program which I routinely test with valgrind.
The platform is Intel i3 dual core, gcc-4.7.3. and for all my tests
valgrind did not give any warning when I started my program


Now I updated to a new computer
Intel i7 4th generation, gcc-4.7.3 and when I start valgrind with my
code I get:

valgrind --tool=memcheck  --trace-children=yes
--vex-iropt-register-updates=allregs-at-mem-access --leak-check=full
--leak-resolution=high --show-reachable=yes  --track-origins=yes
../../Source/Server_Main.out --port 31000 --input_file
Definition_File_PDT_Modes  --show
==28771== Memcheck, a memory error detector
==28771== Copyright (C) 2002-2012, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al.
==28771== Using Valgrind-3.8.1 and LibVEX; rerun with -h for copyright info
==28771== Command: ../../Source/Server_Main.out --port 31000
--input_file Definition_File_PDT_Modes --show
==28771==
vex amd64->IR: unhandled instruction bytes: 0xC4 0xC2 0x79 0xF7 0xC9
0x89 0x45 0x80
vex amd64->IR:   REX=0 REX.W=0 REX.R=0 REX.X=0 REX.B=1
vex amd64->IR:   VEX=1 VEX.L=0 VEX.nVVVV=0x0 ESC=0F38
vex amd64->IR:   PFX.66=1 PFX.F2=0 PFX.F3=0
==28771== valgrind: Unrecognised instruction at address 0x400da4b.
==28771==    at 0x400DA4B: _dl_important_hwcaps (in /lib64/ld-2.17.so)
==28771==    by 0x4007D8E: _dl_init_paths (in /lib64/ld-2.17.so)
==28771==    by 0x4003128: dl_main (in /lib64/ld-2.17.so)
==28771==    by 0x40152E7: _dl_sysdep_start (in /lib64/ld-2.17.so)
==28771==    by 0x4004EA4: _dl_start (in /lib64/ld-2.17.so)
==28771==    by 0x4001647: ??? (in /lib64/ld-2.17.so)
==28771==    by 0x5: ???
==28771==    by 0x7FF000056: ???
==28771==    by 0x7FF000073: ???
==28771==    by 0x7FF00007A: ???
==28771==    by 0x7FF000080: ???
==28771==    by 0x7FF00008D: ???
==28771== Your program just tried to execute an instruction that Valgrind
==28771== did not recognise.  There are two possible reasons for this.
==28771== 1. Your program has a bug and erroneously jumped to a non-code
==28771==    location.  If you are running Memcheck and you just saw a
==28771==    warning about a bad jump, it's probably your program's fault.
==28771== 2. The instruction is legitimate but Valgrind doesn't handle it,
==28771==    i.e. it's Valgrind's fault.  If you think this is the case or
==28771==    you are not sure, please let us know and we'll try to fix it.
==28771== Either way, Valgrind will now raise a SIGILL signal which will
==28771== probably kill your program.
==28771==
==28771== Process terminating with default action of signal 4 (SIGILL)
==28771==  Illegal opcode at address 0x400DA4B
==28771==    at 0x400DA4B: _dl_important_hwcaps (in /lib64/ld-2.17.so)
==28771==    by 0x4007D8E: _dl_init_paths (in /lib64/ld-2.17.so)
==28771==    by 0x4003128: dl_main (in /lib64/ld-2.17.so)
==28771==    by 0x40152E7: _dl_sysdep_start (in /lib64/ld-2.17.so)
==28771==    by 0x4004EA4: _dl_start (in /lib64/ld-2.17.so)
==28771==    by 0x4001647: ??? (in /lib64/ld-2.17.so)
==28771==    by 0x5: ???
==28771==    by 0x7FF000056: ???
==28771==    by 0x7FF000073: ???
==28771==    by 0x7FF00007A: ???
==28771==    by 0x7FF000080: ???
==28771==    by 0x7FF00008D: ???
==28771==
==28771== HEAP SUMMARY:
==28771==     in use at exit: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==28771==   total heap usage: 0 allocs, 0 frees, 0 bytes allocated
==28771==
==28771== All heap blocks were freed -- no leaks are possible
==28771==
==28771== For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v
==28771== ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
Illegal instruction



Any advice what my be causing such a warning?

Thanks

-- 
Adam Jirasek
Email: adam.jira...@gmail.com

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications
Take advantage of what the Cloud has to offer - Avoid Common Pitfalls.
Read the Whitepaper.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=121051231&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Valgrind-users mailing list
Valgrind-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/valgrind-users

Reply via email to