On 01/02/2015 01:21 AM, John Reiser wrote: > If there is any doubt [you have at least 1% doubt] then you should replace > all uses > of sprintf with snprintf instead. Using snprintf is not a fool-proof > cure-all. > If the length limit is reached then the result has no terminating '\0', > so subsequent reads (such as via %s) might over-read the space for the result. > However, this is better than *overwriting* the space for the result.
You're right. Done that. I also added a check to the return value of snprintf: if < 0 or >= size an error has occurred. -- João M. S. Silva ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dive into the World of Parallel Programming! The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net _______________________________________________ Valgrind-users mailing list Valgrind-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/valgrind-users
