On Fri, 2015-01-02 at 14:04 +0000, Tom Hughes wrote: > Given that this is a leak report the other likely cause is that the > addresses are in a shared object that has been unloaded, though it's > surprising that none at all are translatable. Yes, that is strange. Effectively, maybe an unloaded shared object.
Or maybe some JIT-ted code ? Is that a only a 'compiled executable' ? Or does it contain a JIT, e.g. a Java or Javascript library ? It looks also like the default limit of 12 callers is reached at least for some stack traces. > > Otherwise I would at least expect to see the object name. Yes, you are correct : even for a stripped executable, the object name is given. Philippe ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dive into the World of Parallel Programming! The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net _______________________________________________ Valgrind-users mailing list Valgrind-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/valgrind-users
