On 21/09/15 23:04, Tyson Whitehead wrote: > ==32704== Unaddressable byte(s) found during client check request > ... > ==32704== Address 0x243e6040 is 16,384 bytes inside a block of size > 1,048,576 alloc'd > ... > > and > > ==32704== Invalid read of size 8 > ... > ==32704== Address 0x22fe2040 is 0 bytes inside a block of size 1,048,576 > alloc'd > ... > > and > > ==32704== Invalid write of size 8 > ... > ==32704== Address 0x22fe2048 is 8 bytes inside a block of size 1,048,576 > alloc'd > ... > > and on and on and on ... > > Are these valid errors? Everything I found online seemed to indicate that > error addresses should not fall entirely inside allocated blocks.
Why should they not be valid? It probably just means somebody has used a client request to mark that address as invalid. Tom -- Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu) http://compton.nu/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Valgrind-users mailing list Valgrind-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/valgrind-users
