Are the expected results for running a full regtest documented anywhere?  I
couldn't find it so I am assuming there should be no failures at all.
Running the release tar file of 3.11.0 does not pass for me on two different
versions of Linux (both running on x86_64).

 

 

Fedora 22

== 656 tests, 1 stderr failure, 0 stdout failures, 0 stderrB failures, 1
stdoutB failure, 2 post failures ==

gdbserver_tests/hgtls                    (stdoutB)

memcheck/tests/leak_cpp_interior         (stderr)

massif/tests/new-cpp                     (post)

massif/tests/overloaded-new              (post)

 

 

Ubuntu 15.10

== 656 tests, 6 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 0 stderrB failures, 1
stdoutB failure, 2 post failures ==

gdbserver_tests/hgtls                    (stdoutB)

memcheck/tests/leak_cpp_interior         (stderr)

massif/tests/new-cpp                     (post)

massif/tests/overloaded-new              (post)

helgrind/tests/pth_destroy_cond          (stderr)

helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock           (stderr)

helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap           (stderr)

drd/tests/recursive_mutex                (stderr)

drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock                (stderr)

 

 

Is this expected/not expected?  If not expected, how should I proceed?

 

Thank you,

Mark Roberts

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Find and fix application performance issues faster with Applications Manager
Applications Manager provides deep performance insights into multiple tiers of
your business applications. It resolves application problems quickly and
reduces your MTTR. Get your free trial!
https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/302982198;130105516;z
_______________________________________________
Valgrind-users mailing list
Valgrind-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/valgrind-users

Reply via email to