First, I build the program with clang 4.0 with 32 bit command
param, but it run failed because there is unknown instruction;
disInstr(thumb): unhandled instruction: 0x450B 0xD104
==24328== valgrind: Unrecognised instruction at address 0x1089c5.
==24328== at 0x1089C4: compare_exchange_strong (atomic:943)
==24328== by 0x1089C4: atomic_compare_exchange_strong_explicit<unsigned int>
(atomic:1376)
==24328== by 0x1089C4: main (testClang.cpp:22)
It looks like there is some confusion because the program containing the
supposed
unhandled instruction stream:
===== foo.S
.short 0x450B,0xD104
=====
disassembles (in Thumb mode) to
$ gcc -c foo.S
$ gdb foo.o
(gdb) x/x 0
0x0: 0xd104450b
(gdb) x/2i 1 # 1 for Thumb mode
0x1: cmp r3, r1
0x3: bne.n 0xe
which valgrind should handle easily.
Please re-run valgrind on the failing program, using additional parameters to
valgrind:
--trace-notbelow=0 --trace-flags=10000000 2>vgtrace.txt
which gives an instruction-by-instruction trace. The re-directed stderr file
vgtrace.txt will be large, possibly many megabytes. Look near the end of the
file
for the last line that contains "==== SB nnnnn " where nnnnn is a decimal
number of
the block of instructions. Please show us the output from there to the
end of the file, probably a couple dozen lines. Quite possibly it contains
"ldrex r3, [lr]" or 0xE85E 0x3F00; but that should have been handled by the
code in:
===== VEX/priv/guest_arm_toIR.c l.22881
/* ----------------- (T1) LDREX ----------------- */
if (INSN0(15,4) == 0xE85 && INSN1(11,8) == BITS4(1,1,1,1)) {
=====
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Valgrind-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/valgrind-users