On 06/11/2018 17:02, Rafael Antognolli wrote:

My (limited) understanding is that valgrind's mremap doesn't let me remap an address that was allocated by the ioctl, since valgrind doesn't "own" that memory. Is there some way around this, or this is never supposed to work?

I don't see any reason why it shouldn't IF the ioctl wrapper is
correctly written to update valgrind's internal state and record
the mapping that it creates.

If the wrapper doesn't do that then you probably have bigger
problems than whether you can remap it because it will mean
valgrind's state is out of sync with the kernel.

Tom

--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/


_______________________________________________
Valgrind-users mailing list
Valgrind-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/valgrind-users

Reply via email to