Correction from my previous mail..

I ran the configure script like below.
./configure CC='gcc -m32' CXX='g++ -m32'

On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 1:17 PM sandeep bhardwaj <sandyb...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I built 32 bit valgrind on Solaris x86 machine.
>
> Valgrind version : 3.14.
> gcc version : 7.3.0
>
> I ran configure script as below
>
> ./configure CC='cc -m32' CXX='CC -m32'
>
> I removed xpg symbols from vgpreload-solaris.mapfile as i was getting
> errors while building.
>
> I am getting the below error while running valgrind. How do i fix this??
>
> root@*******:/tmp# valgrind ./test
> ==7869== Memcheck, a memory error detector
> ==7869== Copyright (C) 2002-2017, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al.
> ==7869== Using Valgrind-3.14.0 and LibVEX; rerun with -h for copyright info
> ==7869== Command: ./test
> ==7869==
>
>
> *--7869-- WARNING: Serious error when reading debug info--7869-- When
> reading debug info from /lib/ld.so.1:--7869-- Can't make sense of .data
> section mapping*
> ==7869== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
> ==7869==    at 0x4FFD94C5: ??? (in /lib/ld.so.1)
> ==7869==    by 0x4FFBFCF7: ??? (in /lib/ld.so.1)
> ==7869==    by 0x4FFB0A6B: ??? (in /lib/ld.so.1)
> ==7869==    by 0x4FFC031D: ??? (in /lib/ld.so.1)
> ==7869==    by 0x4FFBDB95: ??? (in /lib/ld.so.1)
> ==7869==    by 0x4FFBEA19: ??? (in /lib/ld.so.1)
> ==7869==    by 0x4FFD1C3F: ??? (in /lib/ld.so.1)
> ==7869==    by 0x4FFB1E5E: ??? (in /lib/ld.so.1)
> ==7869==    by 0x57FEFD6E: ???
> ==7869==
> ==7869== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
> ==7869==    at 0x4FFD9469: ??? (in /lib/ld.so.1)
> ==7869==    by 0x4FFB36BD: ??? (in /lib/ld.so.1)
> ==7869==    by 0x4FFB3B54: ??? (in /lib/ld.so.1)
> ==7869==    by 0x4FFB474F: ??? (in /lib/ld.so.1)
> ==7869==    by 0x4FFB5185: ??? (in /lib/ld.so.1)
> ==7869==    by 0x4FFB54ED: ??? (in /lib/ld.so.1)
> ==7869==    by 0x4FFBDD4D: ??? (in /lib/ld.so.1)
> ==7869==    by 0x4FFBF1D6: ??? (in /lib/ld.so.1)
> ==7869==    by 0x4FFD1C3F: ??? (in /lib/ld.so.1)
> ==7869==    by 0x4FFB1E5E: ??? (in /lib/ld.so.1)
> ==7869==    by 0x57FEFD6E: ???
> ==7869==
> ==7869== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
> ==7869==    at 0x4FFD9497: ??? (in /lib/ld.so.1)
> ==7869==    by 0x4FFB36BD: ??? (in /lib/ld.so.1)
> ==7869==    by 0x4FFB3B54: ??? (in /lib/ld.so.1)
> ==7869==    by 0x4FFB474F: ??? (in /lib/ld.so.1)
> ==7869==    by 0x4FFB5185: ??? (in /lib/ld.so.1)
> ==7869==    by 0x4FFB54ED: ??? (in /lib/ld.so.1)
> ==7869==    by 0x4FFBDD4D: ??? (in /lib/ld.so.1)
> ==7869==    by 0x4FFBF1D6: ??? (in /lib/ld.so.1)
> ==7869==    by 0x4FFD1C3F: ??? (in /lib/ld.so.1)
> ==7869==    by 0x4FFB1E5E: ??? (in /lib/ld.so.1)
> ==7869==    by 0x57FEFD6E: ???
> ==7869==
> ==7869== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
> ==7869==    at 0x4FFD94C5: ??? (in /lib/ld.so.1)
> ==7869==    by 0x4FFB36BD: ??? (in /lib/ld.so.1)
> ==7869==    by 0x4FFB3C87: ??? (in /lib/ld.so.1)
> ==7869==    by 0x4FFB3E3B: ??? (in /lib/ld.so.1)
> ==7869==    by 0x4FFB48E2: ??? (in /lib/ld.so.1)
> ==7869==    by 0x4FFB5185: ??? (in /lib/ld.so.1)
> ==7869==    by 0x4FFB54ED: ??? (in /lib/ld.so.1)
> ==7869==    by 0x4FFB7462: ??? (in /lib/ld.so.1)
> ==7869==    by 0x4FFB21D8: ??? (in /lib/ld.so.1)
> ==7869==    by 0x4FFBF22A: ??? (in /lib/ld.so.1)
> ==7869==    by 0x4FFD1C3F: ??? (in /lib/ld.so.1)
> ==7869==    by 0x4FFB1E5E: ??? (in /lib/ld.so.1)
> ==7869==
> ==7869== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
> ==7869==    at 0x4FFD940D: ??? (in /lib/ld.so.1)
> ==7869==    by 0x4FFBFCF7: ??? (in /lib/ld.so.1)
> ==7869==    by 0x4FFB0A6B: ??? (in /lib/ld.so.1)
> ==7869==    by 0x4FFC031D: ??? (in /lib/ld.so.1)
> ==7869==    by 0x4FFBD27E: ??? (in /lib/ld.so.1)
> ==7869==    by 0x4FFBD86B: ??? (in /lib/ld.so.1)
> ==7869==    by 0x4FFB781B: ??? (in /lib/ld.so.1)
> ==7869==    by 0x4FFB81BB: ??? (in /lib/ld.so.1)
> ==7869==    by 0x4FFB88BC: ??? (in /lib/ld.so.1)
> ==7869==    by 0x4FFB5C36: ??? (in /lib/ld.so.1)
> ==7869==    by 0x4FFB5FD9: ??? (in /lib/ld.so.1)
> ==7869==    by 0x4FFB62C5: ??? (in /lib/ld.so.1)
> ==7869==
> ==7869==
> ==7869== HEAP SUMMARY:
> ==7869==     in use at exit: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
> ==7869==   total heap usage: 0 allocs, 0 frees, 0 bytes allocated
>
>
> Thanks & Regards,
> Sandeep
>
_______________________________________________
Valgrind-users mailing list
Valgrind-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/valgrind-users

Reply via email to