Hello Everyone, I am seeing messages like this: --3232-- REDIR: 0x49bf990 (libc.so.6:strncat) redirected to 0x482d71c (strncat) ==3232== Syscall param stat64(file_name) points to uninitialised byte(s) ==3232== at 0x49FD6B8: _xstat (xstat.c:48) ==3232== by 0x41F23: stat (stat.c:51) ==3232== by 0x1EC93: getList (util.c:1379) ==3232== by 0x18E0F: _get_var (ngr.c:3868) ==3232== by 0x19F33: get_var (ngr.c:4049) ==3232== by 0xBB4F: main (daemon.c:346) ==3232== Address 0x7d87ba8c is on thread 1's stack ==3232== in frame #2, created by getList (util.c:1300) ==3232== Uninitialised value was created by a stack allocation ==3232== at 0x1E55C: getList (util.c:1300)
Looking at line 1379 from util.c: if (!stat(listfile, &statbuf)) listfile does exist. statbuf however, is simply defined as: struct stat statbuf; It's not initialized by memset or something, is that what valgrind complains about? Thanks, Reinoud.
_______________________________________________ Valgrind-users mailing list Valgrind-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/valgrind-users
