> That doesn't sound right. I use DHAT extensively and expect a slowdown of>
perhaps 50:1, maybe less. What you're describing is a slowdown factor of> at
least several thousand.>> Bear in mind though that (1) V sequentialises thread
execution, which wil> make a big difference if the program is heavily
multithreaded, and (2)> I suspect dhat's scheme of looking up all memory
accesses in an AVL tree> (of malloc'd blocks) doesn't scale all that well if
you have tens of> millions of blocks.>> Can you run it on a smaller workload?
HiI'll try on something smaller and also get some info on the number of blocks
of memory allocated.A+Paul
_______________________________________________
Valgrind-users mailing list
Valgrind-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/valgrind-users
