* Alexandra Petlanova Hajkova: > The other question is, how should the new option be called? Is "new" a good > name for it? Other options could be --track-fds=high or even > --track-fds=random.
Is this really related to descriptor tracking, though? I would expected a separate option, with a couple of choices: min (the POSIX default) max (what you call new) oldest (first no reuse; after running out of numbers, oldest close first) random strict-max strict-oldest strict-random The difference between the strict-* and plain variants would be that the plain variants check first if any of 0, 1, 2 are unallocated. In that case, they are like min/POSIX. I suspect that should fix pretty much all compatibility issues with max/oldest/random modes. _______________________________________________ Valgrind-users mailing list Valgrind-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/valgrind-users
