> Since the removal of Q-types and the notion that nullability was not part of > the Java type, there was an awkward situation because nullable arrays of > value types and null free arrays of value types had each a different Java > mirror when they were in fact supposed to have the same Java type. > In order to accommodate to the new situation, that arrays can have properties > (nullability, flatness, atomicity, etc.) that are not part of their Java > type, the 1-1 relationship between the *ArrayKlass and the Java mirror must > be broken. > The proposed solution is to dedicate one instance of ObjArrayKlass to > represent the Java type of the array in the JVM, and have this instance being > the counterpart of the Java mirror of the array, and have several instances > of RefArrayKlass and FlatArrayKlass that represent the refinements of the > Java array type. Each RefArrayKlass/FlatArrayKlass encodes the characteristic > of a Java array for a given element type and a set of properties.
Frederic Parain has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision: Remove commented code ------------- Changes: - all: https://git.openjdk.org/valhalla/pull/1452/files - new: https://git.openjdk.org/valhalla/pull/1452/files/c3327d60..b27def57 Webrevs: - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=valhalla&pr=1452&range=05 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=valhalla&pr=1452&range=04-05 Stats: 1 line in 1 file changed: 0 ins; 1 del; 0 mod Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/valhalla/pull/1452.diff Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/valhalla.git pull/1452/head:pull/1452 PR: https://git.openjdk.org/valhalla/pull/1452
