On Thu, 2 Oct 2025 10:23:22 GMT, Damon Fenacci <[email protected]> wrote:

> ## Issue
> `compiler/ciReplay/TestInliningProtectionDomain.java` for class 
> `ProtectionDomainTestNoOtherCompilationPrivate` fails because it expects 
> `bar()` not to be inlined but it gets inlined instead.
> 
> ## Cause
> `TestInliningProtectionDomain` checks that ciReplay inlining does not fail 
> with unresolved signature classes. For class 
> `ProtectionDomainTestNoOtherCompilationPrivate` it expects `Integer` in its 
> signature to be unresolved but it is resolved instead. The reason for this is 
> that in valhalla boxing classes are automatically added when registering a 
> loader ([JDK-8364034](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8364034) (and later 
> [JDK-8364483](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8364483)):
> https://github.com/openjdk/valhalla/blob/708b4f92431df90c115dac840fb8194ec3aac3fe/src/hotspot/share/classfile/systemDictionary.cpp#L215-L217
> 
> ## Fix
> `TestInliningProtectionDomain` should actually use a different class than 
> `Integer` (a class that is not in the migrated value classes set, like 
> `java.lang.Thread`. Changed in all classes for "consistency").
> 
> ## Testing
> Tier 1-3

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: d300922e
Author:    Damon Fenacci <[email protected]>
Committer: Tobias Hartmann <[email protected]>
URL:       
https://git.openjdk.org/valhalla/commit/d300922e749877f6c02d84da1f0eb7039ce8be2e
Stats:     9 lines in 2 files changed: 0 ins; 1 del; 8 mod

8368939: [lworld] TestInliningProtectionDomain fails since jdk-26+11

Reviewed-by: thartmann

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/valhalla/pull/1651

Reply via email to