On Fri, 3 Oct 2025 14:12:34 GMT, Tobias Hartmann <[email protected]> wrote:

> The new memory model rules for strict instance fields (see 
> [JDK-8366372](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8366372)) require a memory 
> barrier at the beginning of `java.lang.Object::<init>`. The JITs will try to 
> omit it if the receiver type is statically known (potentially via CHA + a 
> dependency) and the class does not contain any strict fields.
> 
> Potentially, there's some more tricks that we can play. Most importantly, I 
> think we can omit barriers for final fields at the end of the constructors if 
> the field is also strict. I filed 
> [JDK-8369166](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8369166) for this.
> 
> I added a test that already caught 
> [JDK-8369044](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8369044) and will fail 
> immediately without the JIT changes (on AArch64).
> 
> Thanks,
> Tobias

Thanks for the review Christian!

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/valhalla/pull/1656#issuecomment-3370416529

Reply via email to