On Thu, 2 Jul 2026 10:45:19 GMT, Christian Hagedorn <[email protected]> wrote:
>> The provided test fails with an assertion in `Parse::array_store()` due to >> checking an old outdated type and the assert being off. >> >> We improve the array type in `inline_array_null_guard()` here because we are >> storing `null`: >> https://github.com/openjdk/valhalla/blob/6adeca933a1361c6f44f51c9c266bd1a20a42380/src/hotspot/share/opto/graphKit.cpp#L4041-L4045 >> >> We return the casted array but do not update `array_type` in the caller >> (i.e. in `Parse::array_store()`). We then continue and hit this assert which >> also seems wrong: >> https://github.com/openjdk/valhalla/blob/6adeca933a1361c6f44f51c9c266bd1a20a42380/src/hotspot/share/opto/parse2.cpp#L263 >> >> What we actually want to check is that we either have a known non-flat >> array, in which case the `BoolNode` for the just emitted `flat_array_test()` >> folded to a constant, which we can also check over the current array type, >> or that we find a proper flat array check with a `FlatArrayCheckNode`. >> >> I also squeezed in three unrelated comment updates in `graphKit.cpp` and >> `type.cpp` provided by @marc-chevalier since it's not worth to file an extra >> issue just for that. >> >> Thanks, >> Christian >> >> --------- >> - [x] I confirm that I make this contribution in accordance with the >> [OpenJDK Interim AI Policy](https://openjdk.org/legal/ai). > > Christian Hagedorn has updated the pull request incrementally with one > additional commit since the last revision: > > Update summary Testing looked good. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/valhalla/pull/2614#issuecomment-4868673638
