> We should mark record classes as using preview VM features if they use 
> strictly-initialized fields or early larval frames.
> 
> Maurizio considered this to be P2 given the spec violations, especially with 
> the spurious early larval frames in the class files.
> 
> ---------
> - [x] I confirm that I make this contribution in accordance with the [OpenJDK 
> Interim AI Policy](https://openjdk.org/legal/ai).

Chen Liang has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge 
or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in 
by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains six additional commits since the 
last revision:

 - Update BadCanonicalCtrTest
 - Merge branch 'lworld' of https://github.com/openjdk/valhalla into 
fix/lw-record-strict
 - Merge branch 'lworld' of https://github.com/openjdk/valhalla into 
fix/lw-record-strict
 - Enhance test to track early larval frame
 - Merge branch 'lworld' of https://github.com/openjdk/valhalla into 
fix/lw-record-strict
 - Mark record classfiles as preview minor if they use strict

-------------

Changes:
  - all: https://git.openjdk.org/valhalla/pull/2643/files
  - new: https://git.openjdk.org/valhalla/pull/2643/files/d630139a..4a37b289

Webrevs:
 - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=valhalla&pr=2643&range=01
 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=valhalla&pr=2643&range=00-01

  Stats: 61 lines in 4 files changed: 44 ins; 4 del; 13 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/valhalla/pull/2643.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/valhalla.git pull/2643/head:pull/2643

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/valhalla/pull/2643

Reply via email to