valhalla-spec-experts

Messages by Date

2020/02/12 Re: Superclasses for inline classes Dan Smith
2020/02/12 Valhalla EG 20200212 David Simms
2020/02/12 Re: Superclasses for inline classes Remi Forax
2020/02/12 Re: Superclasses for inline classes Brian Goetz
2020/02/11 Re: Superclasses for inline classes Dan Smith
2020/02/10 JVM specs for <init> and <new> methods Dan Smith
2020/02/10 Re: Reference-default style Dan Smith
2020/02/10 Re: Reference-default style Dan Smith
2020/02/09 Re: Reference-default style John Rose
2020/02/09 Re: Reference-default style Brian Goetz
2020/02/08 Re: Reference-default style John Rose
2020/02/08 Re: Reference-default style Dan Smith
2020/02/07 Re: Reference-default style John Rose
2020/02/07 Re: Reference-default style John Rose
2020/02/07 Re: Reference-default style Brian Goetz
2020/02/07 Re: Reference-default style Brian Goetz
2020/02/07 Re: Reference-default style John Rose
2020/02/07 Re: Reference-default style John Rose
2020/02/07 Re: Reference-default style John Rose
2020/02/07 Re: Reference-default style Dan Smith
2020/02/07 Re: Reference-default style Brian Goetz
2020/02/07 Re: Reference-default style Brian Goetz
2020/02/06 Re: Superclasses for inline classes Brian Goetz
2020/01/29 Valhalla EG 20200129 Frederic Parain
2020/01/15 Valhalla EG 20200115 David Simms
2020/01/15 Re: atomicity for value types forax
2020/01/15 Re: atomicity for value types Martin Buchholz
2020/01/15 Re: atomicity for value types Doug Lea
2020/01/14 Re: atomicity for value types John Rose
2020/01/14 Re: atomicity for value types Remi Forax
2020/01/14 Re: atomicity for value types John Rose
2020/01/14 Re: atomicity for value types John Rose
2020/01/14 Re: atomicity for value types Doug Lea
2020/01/14 Re: atomicity for value types Tobi Ajila
2020/01/13 Re: atomicity for value types John Rose
2020/01/13 Re: atomicity for value types Tobi Ajila
2019/12/22 Re: Reference-default style Maurizio Cimadamore
2019/12/20 Re: Reference-default style Dan Smith
2019/12/20 Re: Reference-default style Dan Smith
2019/12/20 Re: Superclasses for inline classes Brian Goetz
2019/12/20 Re: Superclasses for inline classes Dan Smith
2019/12/20 Re: Reference-default style John Rose
2019/12/20 Re: Superclasses for inline classes John Rose
2019/12/20 Fwd: Re: Reference-default style Brian Goetz
2019/12/20 Re: Reference-default style Brian Goetz
2019/12/20 stronger deprecation John Rose
2019/12/20 Re: Superclasses for inline classes Brian Goetz
2019/12/19 Re: Superclasses for inline classes John Rose
2019/12/19 Re: Superclasses for inline classes John Rose
2019/12/19 Re: Reference-default style Maurizio Cimadamore
2019/12/19 Reference-default style Dan Smith
2019/12/19 Re: Superclasses for inline classes Dan Smith
2019/12/19 Re: Superclasses for inline classes Remi Forax
2019/12/18 atomicity for value types John Rose
2019/12/18 Superclasses for inline classes Dan Smith
2019/12/18 Valhalla EG 20191218 David Simms
2019/12/16 Re: Lifting operations from inline classes to reference projections Remi Forax
2019/12/16 Re: Lifting operations from inline classes to reference projections Brian Goetz
2019/12/16 Re: Lifting operations from inline classes to reference projections Maurizio Cimadamore
2019/12/09 Re: IdentityObject and InlineObject forax
2019/12/09 Re: IdentityObject and InlineObject Maurizio Cimadamore
2019/12/07 Re: IdentityObject and InlineObject forax
2019/12/06 Re: IdentityObject and InlineObject John Rose
2019/12/06 Re: IdentityObject and InlineObject Brian Goetz
2019/12/06 Re: IdentityObject and InlineObject forax
2019/12/06 Re: IdentityObject and InlineObject Brian Goetz
2019/12/06 Re: IdentityObject and InlineObject forax
2019/12/06 Re: IdentityObject and InlineObject Brian Goetz
2019/12/06 Re: IdentityObject and InlineObject forax
2019/12/06 Re: IdentityObject and InlineObject Brian Goetz
2019/12/06 IdentityObject and InlineObject Remi Forax
2019/12/06 Lifting operations from inline classes to reference projections Brian Goetz
2019/12/06 Laying the groundwork Brian Goetz
2019/12/06 Long-awaited State of the Values docs Brian Goetz
2019/12/04 Valhalla EG 20191204 John Rose
2019/11/20 Valhalla EG 20191120 David Simms
2019/11/08 Class validation cleanups Dan Smith
2019/10/22 Cancelled: Valhalla EG 20191023 & 20191106 David Simms
2019/10/18 Re: <init> and factories John Rose
2019/10/18 Re: <init> and factories Brian Goetz
2019/10/17 Re: <init> and factories Dan Smith
2019/10/17 Re: <init> and factories Brian Goetz
2019/10/17 Re: <init> and factories John Rose
2019/10/17 Re: <init> and factories Brian Goetz
2019/10/17 <init> and factories Dan Smith
2019/10/09 Valhalla EG 20191009 David Simms
2019/09/30 Re: Migrating the primitive boxes to values John Rose
2019/09/30 Fwd: Number problems Brian Goetz
2019/09/30 Fwd: The Spirit of acmp Brian Goetz
2019/09/30 Fwd: Migrating the primitive boxes to values Brian Goetz
2019/09/25 Re: Valhalla EG 20190925 John Rose
2019/09/25 Valhalla EG 20190925 David Simms
2019/09/01 Re: Record classfile and runtime API Remi Forax
2019/09/01 Record classfile and runtime API Remi Forax
2019/08/28 Valhalla EG 20190828 David Simms
2019/08/20 Re: Equality for values -- new analysis, same conclusion Dan Smith
2019/08/20 Re: Equality for values -- new analysis, same conclusion Brian Goetz
2019/08/20 Re: Equality for values -- new analysis, same conclusion Brian Goetz
2019/08/17 Re: Equality for values -- new analysis, same conclusion forax
2019/08/14 Leaking instance of uninitialized classes Frederic Parain
2019/08/14 Meeting minutes: 20190814 David Simms
2019/08/13 Re: Equality for values -- new analysis, same conclusion Dan Smith
2019/08/13 Re: Equality for values -- new analysis, same conclusion John Rose
2019/08/13 Re: Collapsing the requirements Dan Smith
2019/08/13 Re: Equality for values -- new analysis, same conclusion Dan Smith
2019/08/12 Re: Equality for values -- new analysis, same conclusion Brian Goetz
2019/08/12 Re: Equality for values -- new analysis, same conclusion Brian Goetz
2019/08/12 Re: Equality for values -- new analysis, same conclusion Brian Goetz
2019/08/12 Re: Equality for values -- new analysis, same conclusion forax
2019/08/12 Re: Equality for values -- new analysis, same conclusion Dan Smith
2019/08/12 Re: Equality for values -- new analysis, same conclusion Brian Goetz
2019/08/12 Re: Equality for values -- new analysis, same conclusion Dan Smith
2019/08/12 Re: Equality for values -- new analysis, same conclusion Brian Goetz
2019/08/12 Re: Equality for values -- new analysis, same conclusion Remi Forax
2019/08/11 Re: Equality for values -- new analysis, same conclusion Brian Goetz
2019/08/11 Re: Equality for values -- new analysis, same conclusion Maurizio Cimadamore
2019/08/10 Re: Equality for values -- new analysis, same conclusion John Rose
2019/08/09 Equality for values -- new analysis, same conclusion Brian Goetz
2019/08/06 Re: Collapsing the requirements John Rose
2019/08/06 Re: Collapsing the requirements John Rose
2019/08/06 Re: Collapsing the requirements Remi Forax
2019/08/06 Re: Collapsing the requirements Brian Goetz
2019/08/06 Re: Collapsing the requirements Frederic Parain
2019/08/06 Re: Collapsing the requirements forax
2019/08/05 Re: Collapsing the requirements John Rose
2019/08/05 Re: Collapsing the requirements John Rose
2019/08/05 Re: Collapsing the requirements Brian Goetz
2019/08/05 Re: Collapsing the requirements forax
2019/08/04 Re: Collapsing the requirements Brian Goetz
2019/08/04 Re: Collapsing the requirements Remi Forax
2019/08/03 Re: Collapsing the requirements Remi Forax
2019/08/03 Collapsing the requirements Brian Goetz
2019/08/02 Re: Toward LW10, the inline interface proposal Brian Goetz
2019/08/02 Toward LW10, the inline interface proposal Remi Forax
2019/08/01 Face to face meeting of yesterday Remi Forax
2019/07/24 Valhalla EG meeting at JVMLS Brian Goetz
2019/07/02 No Valhalla EG meeting July 3rd, minutes from June 19th Karen Kinnear
2019/06/28 Re: Draft LW2 spec Dan Smith
2019/06/24 Re: Draft LW2 spec Dan Smith
2019/06/20 Re: Draft LW2 spec Karen Kinnear
2019/06/18 Re: Draft LW2 spec Dan Smith
2019/06/14 Re: Draft LW2 spec Dan Smith
2019/06/14 Re: Draft LW2 spec Dan Smith
2019/06/14 Re: Draft LW2 spec Brian Goetz
2019/06/14 Re: Draft LW2 spec forax
2019/06/14 Re: Draft LW2 spec Dan Smith
2019/06/14 Re: Draft LW2 spec Remi Forax
2019/06/13 Draft LW2 spec Dan Smith
2019/06/11 Valhalla EG minutes June 05, 2019 Karen Kinnear
2019/05/31 Valhalla EG minutes May 22, 2019 Karen Kinnear
2019/05/21 Valhalla EG notes April 24, 2019 Karen Kinnear
2019/05/15 Re: @Contended and inline classes Doug Lea
2019/05/15 Re: @Contended and inline classes Brian Goetz
2019/05/15 @Contended and inline classes Frederic Parain
2019/05/13 Re: V? and generics Maurizio Cimadamore
2019/05/13 Re: V? and generics Brian Goetz
2019/05/12 Re: a new contract for reference types Peter Levart
2019/05/11 Re: a new contract for reference types Peter Levart
2019/05/10 V? and generics Remi Forax
2019/05/09 Re: It's not safe until it's in the coffer forax
2019/05/09 Re: It's not safe until it's in the coffer forax
2019/05/09 Re: It's not safe until it's in the coffer Brian Goetz
2019/05/09 Re: It's not safe until it's in the coffer Maurizio Cimadamore
2019/05/09 Re: It's not safe until it's in the coffer forax
2019/05/09 Re: It's not safe until it's in the coffer Maurizio Cimadamore
2019/05/08 Re: It's not safe until it's in the coffer forax
2019/05/08 Re: It's not safe until it's in the coffer John Rose
2019/05/08 Re: generic specialization design discussion John Rose
2019/05/08 It's not safe until it's in the coffer Remi Forax
2019/05/08 Re: generic specialization design discussion Dan Smith
2019/05/08 Re: Is V? what we need ? Brian Goetz
2019/05/08 Re: a new contract for reference types John Rose
2019/05/07 Re: a new contract for reference types Peter Levart
2019/05/05 Re: generic specialization design discussion Doug Lea
2019/05/03 No Valhalla EG meeting Weds May 8 Karen Kinnear
2019/05/02 Re: Is V? what we need ? forax
2019/05/02 Re: Is V? what we need ? Maurizio Cimadamore
2019/05/01 Re: Is V? what we need ? John Rose
2019/05/01 Re: Is V? what we need ? forax
2019/05/01 Re: Is V? what we need ? John Rose
2019/05/01 Re: Is V? what we need ? John Rose
2019/05/01 Re: Is V? what we need ? John Rose
2019/05/01 a new contract for reference types John Rose
2019/05/01 Re: Is V? what we need ? Brian Goetz
2019/05/01 Re: Is V? what we need ? Maurizio Cimadamore
2019/05/01 Re: Is V? what we need ? Remi Forax
2019/05/01 Re: Is V? what we need ? Remi Forax
2019/05/01 Re: Is V? what we need ? Brian Goetz
2019/05/01 Re: Is V? what we need ? forax
2019/05/01 Re: Is V? what we need ? Brian Goetz
2019/05/01 Re: Is V? what we need ? Doug Lea
2019/05/01 Re: Is V? what we need ? forax
2019/05/01 Re: Is V? what we need ? Brian Goetz
2019/05/01 Re: Is V? what we need ? forax
2019/05/01 Re: Is V? what we need ? Brian Goetz
2019/05/01 Re: Is V? what we need ? Brian Goetz
2019/05/01 Re: Is V? what we need ? forax
2019/05/01 Re: Is V? what we need ? Brian Goetz
2019/05/01 Re: Is V? what we need ? Maurizio Cimadamore
2019/05/01 Re: Is V? what we need ? Brian Goetz