> On May 16, 2018, at 7:53 PM, Dan Smith <daniel.sm...@oracle.com> wrote:
>> On May 16, 2018, at 4:45 PM, Brian Goetz <brian.go...@oracle.com
>> <mailto:brian.go...@oracle.com>> wrote:
>> No support for any interaction between values and generics _whatsoever_ (I
>> said minimal!)
> You clarified that this means the compiler actively rejects types like
> List<Point>. Not clear to me what would prompt that—it's more work for the
> compiler, the JVM doesn't care either way, and it's easy for users to work
> around (use a raw type).
Right, one could use a raw type, which would induce, by default, a warning from
javac, so maybe a warning is sufficient by default for the List<Point> case.
> But the quality of language support will be "crappy ad-hoc" anyway, so, you
> know, whatever works. I'm just happy to have a compiler at all!
Indeed, it's liberating :-)