> On May 16, 2018, at 7:53 PM, Dan Smith <daniel.sm...@oracle.com> wrote: > >> On May 16, 2018, at 4:45 PM, Brian Goetz <brian.go...@oracle.com >> <mailto:brian.go...@oracle.com>> wrote: >> >> No support for any interaction between values and generics _whatsoever_ (I >> said minimal!) > > You clarified that this means the compiler actively rejects types like > List<Point>. Not clear to me what would prompt that—it's more work for the > compiler, the JVM doesn't care either way, and it's easy for users to work > around (use a raw type). >
Advertising
Right, one could use a raw type, which would induce, by default, a warning from javac, so maybe a warning is sufficient by default for the List<Point> case. > But the quality of language support will be "crappy ad-hoc" anyway, so, you > know, whatever works. I'm just happy to have a compiler at all! Indeed, it's liberating :-) Paul.
