On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 7:51 AM Remi Forax <fo...@univ-mlv.fr> wrote: My only concern now is the dual of Kevin's concern, > what if people discover that they always want to use the identitiy-free > reference types (B2), because it is better integrated with the rest of the > Java world and that in the end, the OG/pure primitive types (B3) are almost > never used. >
B2 is certainly the more basic feature, and could at least hypothetically release earlier than the rest. Regardless of timing, it does seem that the costs and benefits of B3 need to be interpreted *relative* to B2. -- Kevin Bourrillion | Java Librarian | Google, Inc. | kev...@google.com
