Per Andreas Buer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > > Within reason - there is no point in using a cache file that is many > > times the size of your data set. I'm not sure how the allocator works > > in detail, but somewhere between 1x and 2x the size of your data set > > should be sufficient. > Is an "out of memory" situation handled properly now?
No, but it won't occur if your cache is larger than your data set (and I mean "data set", not "working set" - thanks to the likes of Google, most of your data set will be in your working set at some point or other) DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav Senior Software Developer Linpro AS - www.linpro.no _______________________________________________ varnish-dev mailing list [email protected] http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev
