On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 5:11 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp <[email protected]> wrote: > In message <[email protected]>, > =?UT > F-8?Q?Kristian_Lyngst=C3=B8l?= writes: > >>So far, the naming suggestion is a req.hash_control_always_miss = > > Isn't that a bit long-winded ? > > I would probably go with just req.hash_always_miss
True. req.hash_always_miss works for me. I was about to grab my paint brush and get to work on that bike shed, but I figure I'll just leave it at req.hash_always_miss and not suggest req.always_miss. (oops, guess I did it anyway) - Kristian, running out of the office _______________________________________________ varnish-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.varnish-cache.org/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev
