Hi, On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 01:31:33PM +0100, Anders Nordby wrote: >> Well, the code to implement it full was never there, and people were >> reporting core dumps because of it, so we figured we would make the >> non-support for -b explicit, until the code could be written. >> >> There are no objections to supporting it, it's just code to be >> written by somebody... (nudge, nudge, wink, wink...) > >From a developer point of view, I understand that this feature must be > improved or removed. But from a user point of view, it has its use, and > it IS in use. Will this patch be backed out or not? Do I have to use > patches to see backend traffic in a simple Apache style log?
Never got a reply for this. So some people get a core dump, while others do not. How about putting a warning in the man page instead of disabling a desired option? I still use varnishncsa -b, which is *very* useful for me, to study backend traffic. Can we get this option back in please? Bye, -- Anders. _______________________________________________ varnish-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.varnish-cache.org/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev
