I guess a moderator just [auto-]approved this message (but not the 2nd message asking to ignore it)...
Anyhow, 15 minutes after I sent this test failure, I saw that it failed because the netmask on my test box was incorrect -- I corrected the netmask, re-ran the test, and it succeeded. oo On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 7:30 PM, Omachonu Ogali <[email protected]> wrote: > I received the following test failure during the build: > > ---- v1 FAIL CLI response 200 expected 300 > #### top macro def tmpdir=/tmp/vtc.13335.6b8b4567 > #### top macro def bad_ip=10.255.255.255 > # top TEST ././tests/c00003.vtc starting > # top TEST Check that we start if at least one listen address works > ## s1 Starting server > #### s1 macro def s1_addr=127.0.0.1 > #### s1 macro def s1_port=33848 > #### s1 macro def s1_sock=127.0.0.1:33848 > # s1 Listen on 127.0.0.1:33848 > ## s1 Started on 127.0.0.1:33848 > ## v1 Launch > ### v1 CMD: cd ../varnishd && ./varnishd -d -d -n > /tmp/vtc.13335.6b8b4567/v1 -p auto_restart=off -p > syslog_cli_traffic=off -a '127.0.0.1:0' -S > /tmp/vtc.13335.6b8b4567/v1/_S -M 127.0.0.1:47953 -P > /tmp/vtc.13335.6b8b4567/v1/varnishd.pid > -sfile,/tmp/vtc.13335.6b8b4567/v1,10M > ### v1 debug| storage_file: filename: > /tmp/vtc.13335.6b8b4567/v1/varnish.v5O0ho size 10 MB.\n > ### v1 debug| Creating new SHMFILE\n > ### v1 debug| Varnish on Linux,2.6.18-194.el5,x86_64,-sfile,-hcritbit\n > ### v1 debug| 200 193 \n > ### v1 debug| -----------------------------\n > ### v1 debug| Varnish HTTP accelerator CLI.\n > ### v1 debug| -----------------------------\n > ### v1 debug| Type 'help' for command list.\n > ### v1 debug| Type 'quit' to close CLI session.\n > ### v1 debug| Type 'start' to launch worker process.\n > ### v1 debug| \n > ### v1 CLI connection fd = 6 > ### v1 CLI RX 107 > #### v1 CLI RX| vkqhwykqxioyyfcbhxrtjeupeydufenb\n > #### v1 CLI RX| \n > #### v1 CLI RX| Authentication required.\n > #### v1 CLI TX| auth > 2cdbd91ae8754abdc65434d020632ce6a50c54e9646160b56274e81b62f72592\n > ### v1 CLI RX 200 > #### v1 CLI RX| -----------------------------\n > #### v1 CLI RX| Varnish HTTP accelerator CLI.\n > #### v1 CLI RX| -----------------------------\n > #### v1 CLI RX| Type 'help' for command list.\n > #### v1 CLI RX| Type 'quit' to close CLI session.\n > #### v1 CLI RX| Type 'start' to launch worker process.\n > #### v1 CLI TX| param.set listen_address 10.255.255.255:0 > ### v1 CLI RX 200 > ## v1 CLI 200 <param.set listen_address 10.255.255.255:0> > #### v1 CLI TX| vcl.inline vcl1 "backend s1 { .host = \"127.0.0.1\"; > .port = \"33848\"; }\n" > ### v1 CLI RX 200 > #### v1 CLI RX| VCL compiled. > #### v1 CLI TX| vcl.use vcl1 > ### v1 CLI RX 200 > #### v1 CLI TX| start > ### v1 debug| child (13380) Started\n > ### v1 CLI RX 200 > ## v1 CLI 200 <start> > ---- v1 FAIL CLI response 200 expected 300 > ### v1 debug| Child (13380) said \n > ### v1 debug| Child (13380) said Child starts\n > ### v1 debug| Child (13380) said managed to mmap 10485760 bytes of > 10485760\n > # top Test timed out > # top TEST ././tests/c00003.vtc FAILED > > > If this helps out at all regarding my environment... > > # uname -a > Linux box1.testbench 2.6.18-194.el5 #1 SMP Fri Apr 2 14:58:14 EDT 2010 > x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux > > # gcc --version > gcc (GCC) 4.1.2 20080704 (Red Hat 4.1.2-48) > Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO > warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. > > # rpm -qa | grep glibc > glibc-headers-2.5-49.el5_5.4 > glibc-common-2.5-49.el5_5.4 > glibc-devel-2.5-49.el5_5.4 > glibc-2.5-49.el5_5.4 > glibc-2.5-49.el5_5.4 > > > Let me know if you need any other information from my side. > > oo > > _______________________________________________ > varnish-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.varnish-cache.org/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev > _______________________________________________ varnish-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.varnish-cache.org/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev
