In message <[email protected]>, Kristian Lyngstol wri tes:
As I mentioned on IRC, it is intentional that struct storage is not 64-bit, there is no advantage of having storage-chunks larger than a couple of GB and asking for it may cause the kernel to do more than than good is. I've cherry picked some of these changes, be aware that we should use "%jd" printf formats, trusting "%ld" to do the right thing is not productive. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [email protected] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. _______________________________________________ varnish-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev
