Not really a lightthpd or varnish issue. DNS is really you answer.

Also, if you get hit hard in on location, sending it somewhere else and you no 
longer have latency advantage/

On Sep 15, 2011, at 8:32 AM, Thomas Prommer wrote:

> Varnish Community,
> 
> We are managing a cluster farm of 6 nodes that are geographically distributed 
> across Europe (Amsterdam, London, Lisbon, Frankfurt, Zurich, Milan) 
> delivering our internationalized application for the appropriate CCTLD for 
> such nodes. All nodes have the same server image and application deployed. 
> The server distribution is critical to ensure low latency in local markets as 
> well as for SEO reasons.
> 
> The application is a simple LAMP application (no centralized data) that is 
> using Varnish and Lighttpd Fast CGI for optimal scaling. However, we still 
> run into scaling issues were essentially one node gets hit hard with local 
> traffic while all the other severs are pretty idle.
> 
> Our question is if there is a common recommendation of load balancing a 
> server cluster where the servers are geographically distributed and also if 
> varnish or the lighttpd fastcgi server would be more appropriate to carry out 
> the load balancing?
> 
> We know that both systems allow for load balancing but we are concerned that 
> simply load balancing the IPs of geographically servers wouldn't perform too 
> well because an additional round trip to a remote server location would be 
> introduced.
> 
> In a nutshell, our questions are:
> 
> Are there any good strategies around load balancing geographical distributed 
> servers?
> What are the evaluation points for deciding if either Varnish or Lighttpd 
> FastCGI would be more appropriate to own the load balancing responsibility?
> 
> Thanks /Thomas
> 
> _______________________________________________
> varnish-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev

_______________________________________________
varnish-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev

Reply via email to