In message <[email protected]>, Artur Bergman
writes:
>> You mean a 503 ? Same is in my proposal from yesterday: You get
>> into vcl_fetch{} with a synthetic 503 response
>>
>> In some ways this way of doing things is cleaner, but I fear also
>> more confusing.
>
>No, I mean vcl_fetch returns something that you don't like and you want
>to error out.
Yes, that's one of the reasons I found it confusing: You end up in
vcl_fetch{} again, this time with the synth response. To avoid the
obvious loop, we'd have to count that as a restart or something similar.
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
[email protected] | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
_______________________________________________
varnish-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev
