Fixes: #1140
---
bin/varnishd/cache/cache_center.c | 4 ++--
bin/varnishtest/tests/r01140.vtc | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 bin/varnishtest/tests/r01140.vtc
diff --git a/bin/varnishd/cache/cache_center.c
b/bin/varnishd/cache/cache_center.c
index 335bda7..5344467 100644
--- a/bin/varnishd/cache/cache_center.c
+++ b/bin/varnishd/cache/cache_center.c
@@ -813,12 +813,12 @@ cnt_fetchbody(struct sess *sp, struct worker *wrk, struct
req *req)
* Try to salvage the transaction by allocating a
* shortlived object on Transient storage.
*/
- req->obj = STV_NewObject(bo, &req->objcore, TRANSIENT_STORAGE,
- l, nhttp);
if (bo->exp.ttl > cache_param->shortlived)
bo->exp.ttl = cache_param->shortlived;
bo->exp.grace = 0.0;
bo->exp.keep = 0.0;
+ req->obj = STV_NewObject(bo, &req->objcore, TRANSIENT_STORAGE,
+ l, nhttp);
}
bo->stats = NULL;
if (req->obj == NULL) {
diff --git a/bin/varnishtest/tests/r01140.vtc b/bin/varnishtest/tests/r01140.vtc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..483e0d6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/bin/varnishtest/tests/r01140.vtc
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+varnishtest "Transient-salvaged objects ttl should be shortened - #1140"
+
+server s1 {
+ # This response should almost completely fill the storage
+ rxreq
+ txresp -bodylen 1048050
+ # The next one should not fit in the storage, ending up in transient
+ rxreq
+ txresp -bodylen 1024
+} -start
+
+varnish v1 -arg "-p expiry_sleep=0.01 -p nuke_limit=0 -p shortlived=1"
-storage "-smalloc,1m" -vcl+backend {
+} -start
+
+client c1 {
+ txreq -url /url1
+ rxresp
+ expect resp.status == 200
+ expect resp.bodylen == 1048050
+
+ txreq -url /url2
+ rxresp
+ expect resp.status == 200
+ expect resp.bodylen == 1024
+} -run
+
+varnish v1 -expect SMA.Transient.g_bytes != 0
+
+delay 1.5
+
+varnish v1 -expect SMA.Transient.g_bytes == 0
--
1.7.9.5
_______________________________________________
varnish-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev
